|
Post by Bernard Marx on Jun 24, 2024 22:02:27 GMT
Also, the TARDIS and the Doctor- after being comprehensively destroyed in the series 5 finale- are resurrected via Amy’s triggered memories. The only way Sutekh would have survived that event would have been if Amy knew who he was in the first place to remember him.
NuWho can’t even uphold its own ridiculous logic within the same programme.
|
|
|
Post by iank on Jun 24, 2024 22:22:53 GMT
Now that IS true. So dumb.
Yeah, no. Tom killed Sutekh. End of.
|
|
|
Post by UncleDeadly on Jun 24, 2024 22:23:48 GMT
Also, the TARDIS and the Doctor- after being comprehensively destroyed in the series 5 finale- are resurrected via Amy’s triggered memories. The only way Sutekh would have survived that event would have been if Amy knew who he was in the first place to remember him. NuWho can’t even uphold its own ridiculous logic within the same programme. Ah well, that just explains why Sutekh looks like he was taken apart and put back together again without instructions. Stop doing Russell's job for him, Bernard..!
|
|
|
Post by Bernard Marx on Jun 24, 2024 22:28:20 GMT
Also, the TARDIS and the Doctor- after being comprehensively destroyed in the series 5 finale- are resurrected via Amy’s triggered memories. The only way Sutekh would have survived that event would have been if Amy knew who he was in the first place to remember him. NuWho can’t even uphold its own ridiculous logic within the same programme. Ah well, that just explains why Sutekh looks like he was taken apart and put back together again without instructions. Stop doing Russell's job for him, Bernard..! When you accidentally turn out to be a better writer than the showrunner, despite having not *written* a word and having only pointed out some minutia… Going beyond his ego, isn’t that enough evidence that he’s irrefutably and utterly unfit for the job?
|
|
|
Post by Bernard Marx on Jun 24, 2024 22:31:49 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Bernard Marx on Jun 24, 2024 22:36:45 GMT
Likewise, Gatwa’s “Doctor” mentions that Sutekh also destroyed the world in 1066, which is when The Time Meddler is set. How can Sutekh have been in 1066 when:
1. Pyramids of Mars is set in 1911, almost 9 centuries later.
2. The Doctor wouldn’t meet Sutekh for another three incarnations and 11 seasons. Ergo, he would not be on the TARDIS during the Hartnell era.
Davies hasn’t thought anything through, has he?
|
|
|
Post by UncleDeadly on Jun 24, 2024 22:39:16 GMT
Ah well, that just explains why Sutekh looks like he was taken apart and put back together again without instructions. Stop doing Russell's job for him, Bernard..! When you accidentally turn out to be a better writer than the showrunner, despite having not *written* a word and having only pointed out some minutia… Going beyond his ego, isn’t that enough evidence that he’s irrefutably and utterly unfit for the job? Yes.
|
|
|
Post by UncleDeadly on Jun 24, 2024 22:42:51 GMT
Likewise, Gatwa’s “Doctor” mentions that Sutekh also destroyed the world in 1066, which is when The Time Meddler is set. How can Sutekh have been in 1066 when: 1. Pyramids of Mars is set in 1911, almost 9 centuries later. 2. The Doctor wouldn’t meet Sutekh for another three incarnations and 11 seasons. Ergo, he would not be on the TARDIS during the Hartnell era. Davies hasn’t thought anything through, has he? "Okay Mr. Smart Guy. YOU tell us what colour it should be..."
|
|
|
Post by burrunjor on Jun 24, 2024 22:49:10 GMT
Plot consistency is for anoraks.
|
|
|
Post by Ludders II on Jun 25, 2024 1:13:25 GMT
Sutekh during every mystery from Pyramids to Power of the Doctor: "na, can't be arsed" Sutekh when he discovers the mystery of Ruby's birth: "shit, I gotta know!" 😆
|
|
|
Post by burrunjor on Jun 25, 2024 8:29:12 GMT
Remember when I said RTD makes it up as he goes along? Well Anita Dobson more or less admits that here LOL. x.com/i/status/1805331365140812090Even he doesn't know who Mrs Flood is.
|
|
|
Post by Cherry Pepsi Maxil on Jun 25, 2024 9:13:39 GMT
Anita Dobson was in the Red Dwarf episode Psirens. Her brief two second scene in that is still better than any of her Mrs Flood scenes
|
|
|
Post by burrunjor on Jun 25, 2024 10:12:02 GMT
Anita Dobson was in the Red Dwarf episode Psirens. Her brief two second scene in that is still better than any of her Mrs Flood scenes Is she the babe that gets shot in the Kochanski vision? I seem to recall reading that was a big star and thinking how insane it was they got her in for two seconds LOL.
|
|
|
Post by Cherry Pepsi Maxil on Jun 25, 2024 10:24:56 GMT
Anita Dobson was in the Red Dwarf episode Psirens. Her brief two second scene in that is still better than any of her Mrs Flood scenes Is she the babe that gets shot in the Kochanski vision? I seem to recall reading that was a big star and thinking how insane it was they got her in for two seconds LOL. She is indeed. I think she's mostly known for being in Eastenders.
|
|
|
Post by Cherry Pepsi Maxil on Jun 25, 2024 10:25:44 GMT
Is she the babe that gets shot in the Kochanski vision? I seem to recall reading that was a big star and thinking how insane it was they got her in for two seconds LOL. She is indeed. I think she's mostly known for being in Eastenders. She also won rear of the year in 1987 lol
|
|