|
|
Post by Bernard Marx on Apr 18, 2022 15:18:09 GMT
Get this: The series 11 opener achieved 8.2 million viewers overnight. This special achieved 2.2 million. Therefore, in the space of three and a half years, Chibnall’s era has officially haemorrhaged 75% of its initial audience.
I guess that’s an achievement worth commending?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bernard Marx on Apr 18, 2022 15:23:16 GMT
I saw this and laughed. What a piece of shit. Yeah it's our fault, the people who warned him against this for the last 6 f*cking years who he scoffed at for not understanding how viewing figures worked. "IF YOU ALLOW ME TO CHECK MY NOTES!" PS the little toad doesn't understand that the viewers for this episode are based on previous episodes. It's flux and the timeless children that dragged it down to this. I love the fact that to "Mr. Tardis" it's an either-or situation. That you either have sci-fi and adventure or a moral/message, thus completely ignoring how science fiction is fundamentally supposed to work.
Look up "Allegory", William, you'll find it under "A".
...And while you're at it do us all a f*cking favour and show it to your mate, Chibnall...
I guess, by that metric, that makes Solaris, 2001, Blade Runner, The Right Stuff and Metropolis all bereft of any deeper meaning then? Or, by extension, anything written by Clarke, Wells or Asimov too? |
|
|
|
Post by UncleDeadly on Apr 18, 2022 16:22:34 GMT
I love the fact that to "Mr. Tardis" it's an either-or situation. That you either have sci-fi and adventure or a moral/message, thus completely ignoring how science fiction is fundamentally supposed to work.
Look up "Allegory", William, you'll find it under "A".
...And while you're at it do us all a f*cking favour and show it to your mate, Chibnall...
I guess, by that metric, that makes Solaris, 2001, Blade Runner, The Right Stuff and Metropolis all bereft of any deeper meaning then? Or, by extension, anything written by Clarke, Wells or Asimov too? Yes. It does. |
|
