|
|
Post by RobFilth on Apr 8, 2022 6:04:59 GMT
Johnson coming down on the 'biological men shouldn't compete in women's sport' side of the trans argument will play better in a GE than Starmer's confusion, even if the Tories get annihilated in the May polls. Not sure the Tories will get annihilated in the May elections because they're starting off from a low base to begin with after getting annihilated and losing over 1,000 seats the last time they were contested, but the media at the time focused on the narrative "Corbyn didn't take Wandsworth"(a borough they were unlikely to take anyway), so everyone could be forgiven for missing that one. Sajid Javid warned Theresa May that her floundering over Brexit would hand the keys to number ten to Corbyn and the Tories went into panic mode after and this was May/June 2019. Amazing to think how quickly things changed after that election and how the current MSN narrative has erased just how close Corbyn repeatedly got to power. I expect even if they're flundering in the polls and an uber low turn out, for the Tories to pick up some small amount of seats taken away from them last time. I think Sadiq Khan will retain being London Mayor, but on a hugely reduced majority. |
|
|
|
Post by RobFilth on Apr 8, 2022 7:40:08 GMT
Johnson coming down on the 'biological men shouldn't compete in women's sport' side of the trans argument will play better in a GE than Starmer's confusion I've got a feeling Labour will be cowed into submission by this right wing attack before any General Election, Starmer will probably make Rosie Duffield his Minister for Equalities or some such bollocks to circumvent it, thereby pissing off every single trans person or those who dislike transphobia. Murdoch f*cking loves this attack-line. "Yes Keith, you can have a Labour Government but only if you allow me to ridicule and scapegoat the trans-community for the lolz" He's an absolute piece of utter shit. |
|
|
|
Post by Bernard Marx on Apr 8, 2022 10:38:19 GMT
Amazing to think how quickly things changed after that election and how the current MSN narrative has erased just how close Corbyn repeatedly got to power. And even after the Tories making an absolute cock-up of everything under the sun, Starmer is still falling behind the guy he's constantly traduced and belittled since he became leader.  Like I said earlier, any gains on Labour's part will occur courtesy of the collapsing Tory vote, not because of anything Labour are doing themselves. |
|
|
|
Post by burrunjor on Apr 8, 2022 11:20:11 GMT
Amazing to think how quickly things changed after that election and how the current MSN narrative has erased just how close Corbyn repeatedly got to power. And even after the Tories making an absolute cock-up of everything under the sun, Starmer is still falling behind the guy he's constantly traduced and belittled since he became leader. Like I said earlier, any gains on Labour's part will occur courtesy of the collapsing Tory vote, not because of anything Labour are doing themselves. That's still just fall out from Jeremy Corbyn and his commie coddling. |
|
|
|
Post by burrunjor on Apr 8, 2022 11:29:07 GMT
Having said that, I'm willing to change my mind and posit this prediction now. Given the unprecedented degree of Tory cock-ups since 2020, I can see Starmer scraping in with a minority government in 2023 or 2024, albeit with a practically non-existent turnout. I reckon it'd only last for a mere term, mind you, because in every other respect, Labour's long-term decline since 1997 (with the telling exception of 2017) hasn't changed one bit. Starmer's got absolutely bugger all going for him on either policy or personality, and is probably actually more authoritarian on foreign policy in light of his endorsement of a no-fly zone over Ukraine. It's just a question of whether Johnson's unpopularity exceeds Starmer's, which is definitely feasible now. In my opinion Starmer is the Hillary Clinton to Bo Jo's Donald Trump, circa 2016. IE both are awful, awful choices. It's literally like a bad parody that in a country of millions, those are the two choices. Still Bo Jo and Trump A/ are just the right, and don't represent what is supposed to be the opposition, becoming MORE right wing than the actual right, which both Hillary and Starmer do. She is the epitome of the crooked, war mongering, wall street Democrats, whilst he is a glorious return to New Labour. B/ Starmer and Clinton are bigger war hawks, and given the world is sitting on a powder keg that is the last type of person you want in office, even if their opposition wants to drown all the first born! I genuinely think if President Clinton were in term now and Keir Starmer where Prime Minister then WW3 would have already happened. Starmer is a macho idiot who, whilst Clinton I genuinely think was a sadistic, bloodthirsty monster. Even Biden isn't as bad as her. He's also a macho idiot and crooked as they come, but his dementia has at least stopped him from going too far. (Half the time he probably thinks we are at war with Mars.) |
|
|
|
Post by RobFilth on Apr 8, 2022 16:27:00 GMT
Far from being like Trump other than their maverick manner, I don't actually believe Johnson is as right wing as is made out.
I actually think he is slightly more to the left than bloody Starmer is!
Can you imagine Furlough under Starmer with Murdoch screaming at him "no way!" because I bloody well can't.
|
|
|
|
Post by burrunjor on Apr 8, 2022 16:36:25 GMT
Far from being like Trump other than their maverick manner, I don't actually believe Johnson is as right wing as is made out. I actually think he is slightly more to the left than bloody Starmer is! Can you imagine Furlough under Starmer with Murdoch screaming at him "no way!" because I bloody well can't. Again though the same was true of Trump in regards to Clinton. Trump at least back in 2016, was the supporter of Wiki Leaks, Assange, wanted to get on with Russia, pull troops out of the middle east, smooth things over with Assad and his victory was a massive blow to the mainstream media's bullshit. Hillary in contrast had the 100 percent backing of the MSM, was backed by all of America's crooked allies like Saudi Arabia, was all for increasing tensions with Putin and Russia, wanted Assange arrested, and wanted a no fly zone over Syria as well as to topple Assad. Sadly however due to the Russia gate crap, Trump was pressured into doing the opposite of all that he promised. (I don't let him off the hook that way however as Trump should have had the courage of his convictions.) With Bo Jo meanwhile obviously he isn't completely comparable to Trump. (For one thing his time in office hasn't been constantly undermined by the MSM.) Still overall it's the same situation that the leader of the supposedly more left wing, liberal opposition is actually more right wing and certainly more hawkish than the right wing candidate. Meanwhile genuine left wing candidates like Tulsi and Corbyn can't get anywhere due to the MSM smearing them as ridiculous things. (In both cases in fact, how they were smeared is a holdover of McCarthyism, IE Corbyn's a dirty commie, Tulsi is a traitor working for Russia.) |
|
|
|
Post by Bernard Marx on Apr 26, 2022 14:25:30 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by mott1 on Sept 30, 2022 14:24:46 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by cyberhat on Oct 1, 2022 17:33:19 GMT
The Labour party is currently run by psychopaths. See here (and not on the BBC, ITV or any newspaper or James O'Brien):
|
|
|
|
Post by RobFilth on Oct 1, 2022 23:44:26 GMT
The Labour party is currently run by psychopaths. See here (and not on the BBC, ITV or any newspaper or James O'Brien): Check out the reactions of all the Blairites to these documentaries. Bloody liars. Their conference looks like a bloody BNP rally. |
|
|
|
Post by mott1 on Oct 8, 2022 18:47:28 GMT
It's a sorry state of affairs when the PM feels the need to borrow from Starmer's conference speech! Of all people...
I'm no Boris fan but at least his material sounded original (if increasingly demented).
|
|
|
|
Post by Bernard Marx on Jan 5, 2023 18:53:57 GMT
Starmer officially backs NHS privatisation and sneers at "spending"- a classic right-wing pro-austerity talking point. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-64166870"But we won't be able to spend our way out of their mess - it's not as simple as that." "For national renewal, there is no substitute for a robust private sector, creating wealth in every community." Yay! More free-market economics and private outsourcing! All hail neoliberalism! This is obviously what the general population wants, rather than a few billionaire donors and media moguls who have their money stuffed in the Cayman Islands. What a choice for the next election: Establishment middle-manager versus establishment middle-manager. Just when we need some modicum of change... |
|
|
|
Post by burrunjor on Jan 6, 2023 9:57:57 GMT
Starmer officially backs NHS privatisation and sneers at "spending"- a classic right-wing pro-austerity talking point. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-64166870"But we won't be able to spend our way out of their mess - it's not as simple as that." "For national renewal, there is no substitute for a robust private sector, creating wealth in every community." Yay! More free-market economics and private outsourcing! All hail neoliberalism! This is obviously what the general population wants, rather than a few billionaire donors and media moguls who have their money stuffed in the Cayman Islands. What a choice for the next election: Establishment middle-manager versus establishment middle-manager. Just when we need some modicum of change... It really is enough to make you cry. How can any human being honestly justify a private health care system other than "I'm a greedy bastard." I love the way the right try and justify it with "waiting times are too much, because too many people are being given health care." So they honestly think that the solution to that is to not give the poor people health care and let them die rather than I don't know pour more money and resources into it? How can anyone justify that? It's f*cking eugenics! I honestly think that if a country doesn't have universal health care then it is not a civilised country. Looking after your sick, disabled and elderly is surely the bare minimum for a society. Hell some f*cking animals at least attempt to do that. I've always said that America is a failed country for its private health care alone (though looking at it's political system that's so corrupt Donald Trump was seen as a radical outsider, the havoc its wrecked on other countries and the racial tensions hat are now ripping it apart at the seams, it seems its failed in almost every way.) Now sadly the UK can join its moronic cousin in every way. Having said that we shouldn't let the destruction of the NHS that could very well one day kill us, distract us from the all important issue, which is that f*cking bitch Meghan Markle trying to tar the name of the Royal Family. God I hate Meghan so much I want to see her get completely naked, smear herself in butter and force me to lick it off so I can tell her how much I hate her. |
|
|
|
Post by cyberhat on Jan 6, 2023 11:37:47 GMT
Quick explanation of the privatisation scam. Applies especially to the NHS.
|
|
