|
|
Post by Bernard Marx on Nov 19, 2021 15:43:18 GMT
Don't forget the CIA's insane attempts to deport John Lennon too. America's moral fabric was under immediate threat from comedians and harmonica players...  The arts are, after all, the biggest threat to establishment interests. It's why the arseholes at the top keep trying to defund them... |
|
|
|
Post by UncleDeadly on Nov 19, 2021 16:59:23 GMT
Why am I a possible sadako? Have I said anything contentious? Everyone who's posted fewer than 10 posts has that ranking- don't worry about it.  s a possible Sadako. Until they prove they're NOT. It's just like being a Communist... |
|
|
|
Post by fredjones on Nov 19, 2021 19:24:53 GMT
This is most interesting. I am tempted to derail this thread given that it is already derailed and say something further about the security service and doctor who. This may perhaps get others into trouble or perhaps the wombles of Curzon street or Cheltenham might for all we know turn up on here. I don't care about myself but I'm not sure how these things would work in the UK so if you are worried in anyway please look away now. I will do this stage by stage if I do if people are interested Question 1 At the outset I should ask the following (it is in relation to doctor who and MI5 but it is not in relation to false flag attacks as they are called) 1) As a general rule, do we accept the principle that numbers have validity in terms of whether determining that an attack has occurred in relation to that number. For example, is it not rather difficult to argue that the remembrance day bombing did not occur in relation to the number 11 given that a) The person blew himself up at 11 on a day which is named after but which does not occur on armistice Sunday, a day which is on the 11th or the 11th. b) He was headed for the commemoration. c) It has been declared a terrorist incident |
|
|
|
Post by fredjones on Nov 19, 2021 20:01:23 GMT
America's moral fabric was under immediate threat from comedians and harmonica players... The arts are, after all, the biggest threat to establishment interests. It's why the arseholes at the top keep trying to defund them... I think you should apologize. There is nothing wrong with having a Boris Yeltsin impersonator and a member of the baring family (Dominic Cummings) as his advisor. What could go wrong? * This is a joke. |
|
|
|
Post by RobFilth on Nov 20, 2021 6:17:07 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by fredjones on Nov 20, 2021 7:32:56 GMT
Ah that explains it. A new one. I ask because there is a tendency online in certain places to be less friendly to newcomers. |
|
|
|
Post by fredjones on Nov 20, 2021 7:35:55 GMT
By the way, if these sorts of discussions are not permitted on the forum, as is sometimes the case elsewhere and you would rather I did not continue, please let me know
|
|
|
|
Post by iank on Nov 20, 2021 7:52:36 GMT
I think you're safe there, mate.  |
|
|
|
Post by fredjones on Nov 20, 2021 8:30:58 GMT
I think you're safe there, mate. Well thanks for that. One has to consider the following 1) I'm sure you have visited doctor who forums in the past and seen what they can be like. Being unfamiliar with the concept of personal totems on a forum, I saw the above and though "Hello why do they think I am this sadako?". Whereupon someone pointed out to me the concept of a totem. 2) The sort of discussion in relation to the security service will necessarily attract attention from the wombles of Curzon street (as I like to call the SS) or indeed their counterparts in Cheltenham (GCHQ) or indeed organisations. This does not affect me but it would be rude of me not to point out that, if the discussion in relation to my question above was followed to its logical conclusion, there is a likelihood that it would either be the case that one would get trolls from the later on here from the likes of JTRIG (or indeed one of their counterparts) or potentially, but far less likely, real world stuff might happen to people. Moreover many people find such topics either scary or taxing or indeed rather abhor any criticism of those services. The later occurs tends to be case in England and occurs, as was the case with Catholic church in Ireland in the 1970s, due to the class system or its afterglow. I will leave the question there to see if anyone is interested and post the next question if anyone is |
|
|
|
Post by UncleDeadly on Nov 20, 2021 12:15:59 GMT
This is great. All we need now is for Stanley Unwin to join the forum and we've got the full set.
|
|
|
|
Post by fredjones on Nov 20, 2021 12:57:51 GMT
Yes I should probably reword the second part of that because unlike my other posts, it used a lot of acronyms and presumed familiarity with the subject. There were also one or two grammatical and spelling errors. Here goes 2) The sort of discussion in relation to the security service (that's MI5 to you and me) will necessarily attract attention from the Wombles of Curzon street (as some people call the security service or MI5) or indeed their counterparts in Cheltenham (GCHQ who deal with signals intelligence or rather the internet) or indeed other organisations to whom this discussion might be said to pertain. This does not affect me but it would be rude of me not to point out that, if the discussion in relation to my question above was followed to its logical conclusion, there is a likelihood that it would either be the case that 1) One would get trolls from the later on here from the likes of JTRIG (or indeed one of their counterparts). JTRIG or the "joint threat research intelligence group" is a part of GCHQ and their role is to infiltrate forums and twist conversations where they deem it convenient. There is a good article on JTRIG here. 2) Potentially, and a remote possibility, real world stuff might happen to people. Moreover it is reasonable many people find such topics either scary or taxing or indeed rather abhor any criticism of those services. Or they think such discussions pertain to that dreadful series known as James Bond rather than something which is rather more mundane. As such, such discussions as these have a tendency to annoy or to scare. It is also the case that there tends to be an abhorrence of criticism of the authorities in England and this occurs, as was the case with Catholic church in Ireland in the 1970s, due to the class system or its afterglow&/replacement (in Ireland). By authorities, I do not refer to the likes of the conservative party or the executive but the civil service People tend do go "come off it" |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2021 23:44:49 GMT
Maybe we should change it from possible Sadako to possible Barlow instead. |
|
|
|
Post by RobFilth on Nov 20, 2021 23:57:33 GMT
Maybe we should change it from possible Sadako to possible Barlow instead. All the Monks... ...will be shot. |
|
|
|
Post by Bernard Marx on Nov 21, 2021 0:02:07 GMT
Maybe we should change it from possible Sadako to possible Barlow instead. All the Monks... ...will be shot. That's a classic from what I remember. Ah- just found the video! Bloody hilarious. |
|
|
|
Post by fredjones on Nov 21, 2021 8:45:15 GMT
Alas, I do not understand the reference to Barlow.
I do not think people "would be shot" or anything of that nature but there is a possibility that if things were followed to their natural conclusion in terms of what I might outline and if it were discussed openly then some form of "interaction" might occur in particular because this is a small forum where such things would less widely imparted.
This is because its to do with corruption within the intelligence services and as the intelligence services tend not to like such discussions.
At least that's my experience.
|
|
