Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2021 15:13:57 GMT
The lowest rated episode of Who on the site by a very long way. How embarrassing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2021 15:34:14 GMT
Another shit award to go in this forsaken era’s cabinet.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bernard Marx on Oct 20, 2021 10:50:57 GMT
The lowest rated episode of Who on the site by a very long way. How embarrassing. I've noticed that it's now slipped significantly below Time and the Rani (which has actually climbed somewhat recently), Twin Dilemma, episode 6 of the Space Pirates, Fear Her, Arachnids in the UK and The Tsuranga Conundrum, all of which achieved 4.8/10 at the bare minimum.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 20, 2021 12:50:49 GMT
The lowest rated episode of Who on the site by a very long way. How embarrassing. I've noticed that it's now slipped significantly below Time and the Rani (which has actually climbed somewhat recently), Twin Dilemma, episode 6 of the Space Pirates, Fear Her, Arachnids in the UK and The Tsuranga Conundrum, all of which achieved 4.8/10 at the bare minimum. Yeah, Time and the Rani Part One has a 5.4/10 which isn't amazing but not embarrassingly low. On another note, it's interesting that Colin Baker is the only classic Doctor not to have an episode voted an 8 or higher. His highest rated episode is part two of Revelation which has a 7.9. McCoy's best is an 8.7 (Remembrance Part four) and Davison's best, Caves part four, is a 9.0. I think 80s Who is largely underrated on IMDB. Stuff like Mawdryn should at least be in the 8s, not the 7s as should Kinda. |
|
