|
Post by burrunjor on Mar 24, 2021 21:32:55 GMT
Issues with women. Oh dear. You're really that desperate? What is it this time then? First I hated them? Then I worshipped them? What now? What are you going to conjure up. As I like Amy Winehouse that means I want women to die at age 27 or something stupid like that? And yeah things about me and Rob having a little cuddle looks desperate. And as for me getting to you, well it was enough for you to follow me to this forum and target me above all else. Hmm don't see you going after Bernard or Mott1, (not that I want you too, but it's telling.) Besides I don't even want to get to you anyway. You've been trying to get to me since 2016. First you accused me of just not being able to stand women in anything for 2 years, then you pretend to make amends and do concern trolls about me liking Ingrid Oliver, and now when everybody is calling you out on Platypus you and your cronies like Ludders still single me out above all else. I've said what I think. You need to stop dragging the forum down into the latest political cult you've become a part of. 2016-17 it was SJWs, now it's platypus. Be an individual and stop digging yourself into a hole. If you're not whining about emasculation, you're flashing your feminist credentials for liking Xena. And I'm targeting you because you targeted me. You and Rob can't stop going on about Platypus and you (not Rob, notably) referred to me by name, caling me 'Mangina Mike', which is an interesting reference to femininity. It's telling that you can't take what you give. The only people 'calling me out' on Platypus are you and Rob posting videos nobody's watching. No fokker else is saying anything because no fokker else cares! Also, 'cult', lol Not sure about cults, but I can see a fair few canutes. Considering I despise modern feminism, why on earth would I want to tout my feminist credentials. I only bring Xena up as an example of a well done female hero. I wouldn't expect you to understand considering you have a pitiful knowledge of female led or created works of entertainment, hence why you thought Jodie was groundbreaking back in 2017. And check the thread most people are calling you and your creepy mentor out. I've not even contributed to that many threads ffs. Hell you're targeting me more than Rob LOL. And can't take what I dish out? For ages I defended myself against you, Seal, Lady and Penny all dogpiling on me for talking about things you'd come to agree with in 5 years. I actually didn't want to get dragged into this as I didn't want to get into a similar 5 against 1 debate the other way which could easily happen. Again clearly you think you can deflect onto me, or that I am an easy target, because you are still stuck in 2016 and think you can push the "he doesn't like women" narrative to the other posters here. Fortunately they know better and know that trying to make out I have problems with women is like Ben Shapiro telling Andrew Neil he must be on the left. I'm not going to bother responding to you after this though. It's just deflection at this stage on your part. Stop digging yourself into a hole.
|
|
|
Post by RobFilth on Mar 24, 2021 21:33:01 GMT
The only people 'calling me out' on Platypus are you and Rob posting videos nobody's watching. Over 4 million views actually, so technically incorrect.
|
|
|
Post by burrunjor on Mar 24, 2021 21:37:13 GMT
One last thing I would like to say though is that whilst I brought up Mike and his creepy mentor here today, that was only after Mike had gone on a big rant about how I deserve to be ridiculed on ArcHive, so again for him to play the victim is rich.
|
|
mike
Johnny Come Lately
Posts: 30
|
Post by mike on Mar 24, 2021 21:46:51 GMT
One last thing I would like to say though is that whilst I brought up Mike and his creepy mentor here today, that was only after Mike had gone on a big rant about how I deserve to be ridiculed on ArcHive, so again for him to play the victim is rich. Eh? No I didn't.
|
|
mike
Johnny Come Lately
Posts: 30
|
Post by mike on Mar 24, 2021 21:49:20 GMT
If you're not whining about emasculation, you're flashing your feminist credentials for liking Xena. And I'm targeting you because you targeted me. You and Rob can't stop going on about Platypus and you (not Rob, notably) referred to me by name, caling me 'Mangina Mike', which is an interesting reference to femininity. It's telling that you can't take what you give. The only people 'calling me out' on Platypus are you and Rob posting videos nobody's watching. No fokker else is saying anything because no fokker else cares! Also, 'cult', lol Not sure about cults, but I can see a fair few canutes. Considering I despise modern feminism, why on earth would I want to tout my feminist credentials. I only bring Xena up as an example of a well done female hero. I wouldn't expect you to understand considering you have a pitiful knowledge of female led or created works of entertainment, hence why you thought Jodie was groundbreaking back in 2017. And check the thread most people are calling you and your creepy mentor out. I've not even contributed to that many threads ffs. Hell you're targeting me more than Rob LOL. And can't take what I dish out? For ages I defended myself against you, Seal, Lady and Penny all dogpiling on me for talking about things you'd come to agree with in 5 years. I actually didn't want to get dragged into this as I didn't want to get into a similar 5 against 1 debate the other way which could easily happen. Again clearly you think you can deflect onto me, or that I am an easy target, because you are still stuck in 2016 and think you can push the "he doesn't like women" narrative to the other posters here. Fortunately they know better and know that trying to make out I have problems with women is like Ben Shapiro telling Andrew Neil he must be on the left. I'm not going to bother responding to you after this though. It's just deflection at this stage on your part. Stop digging yourself into a hole. I have a pitiful knowledge of most forms of 'entertainment' because outside of the few shows I'm interested in, I'm not arsed. But I've never claimed otherwise. You didn't want to be dragged into it? You inserted yourself into it, Burun, even lying about being involved in the original debate. I said you didn't dislike women. The only hole around here is the one you're buried inside.
|
|
|
Post by burrunjor on Mar 24, 2021 21:50:56 GMT
One last thing I would like to say though is that whilst I brought up Mike and his creepy mentor here today, that was only after Mike had gone on a big rant about how I deserve to be ridiculed on ArcHive, so again for him to play the victim is rich. Eh? No I didn't. Yes it was in the response to Rob "I only ridicule Bumfluff when he deserves it." I think I've said my piece now however and I don't much care for this anymore. If you want to associate with Platypus fine, but you'll find a lot more people than me will pull you up for it, and in a lot worse ways.
|
|
mike
Johnny Come Lately
Posts: 30
|
Post by mike on Mar 24, 2021 21:52:49 GMT
Yes it was in the response to Rob "I only ridicule Bumfluff when he deserves it." I think I've said my piece now however and I don't much care for this anymore. If you want to associate with Platypus fine, but you'll find a lot more people than me will pull you up for it, and in a lot worse ways. Oh, that. Yeah, you were a passing thought, as usual. I didn't say people should pile on you, as you are insinuating. And that was after you lied.
|
|
|
Post by RobFilth on Mar 24, 2021 22:00:31 GMT
Cheers everyone!
|
|
|
Post by RobFilth on Mar 24, 2021 22:18:54 GMT
Hey look everyone! I found to sign to go outside of Platypus functions when the cult leader comes to visit. I'm sure it will provoke people to think and use their brains, eh? That way they might be intelligent enough to understand the context.
|
|
|
Post by RobFilth on Mar 25, 2021 4:44:10 GMT
Okay, I'd just like to address some points here, even if it is quite evident at this stage that I'm completely wasting my time and addressing a brick wall that is so radicalized up their own arsehole that the denialism is completely impenetrable. Anyway, neither of you knew B. I, however, knew him in person. He was the one who introduced me to Adorno and would've understood everything I've said. Neither B nor Adorno would have given endorsement to a Paedophile organization like your nonce-case cult leader whom you're evidently so unquestionably devoted to has however. Show me a single instance where Adorno or B made favourable comments about NAMBLA, they didn't. B would not have supported Cutrones statement, full stop. Nor indeed would he have thought Cutrones comment relevant to Adornos essay. In fact, he would have seen it as reprehensible exploitative self-entitled spin. You two really need to get lives -- or a room, if you'd prefer. And you need to address your self-denial mate, it's not doing you any favours. There isn't really any great chumminess between myself and Burrunjor as well you know, it's just that PEOPLE of ALL persuasions DON'T LIKE NONCES. Now grow the hell up and deal with it Mike. Don't worry, you're both welcome to fantasise about me if you wish. I know you're utterly obsessed with me. And once again, you self project. As I told you the previous night, THIS ISN'T ABOUT YOU! It's about the disgusting endorsements given by the Platypus cult leader. So mature a bit, stop taking it personally, stop prevaricating and obfuscating in denialism, and face up to the facts that he's a dirty filthy nonce case. You're not his man/boy are you? You don't owe Cutrone anything. Not a damn thing. Btw, Rob, the word is Bonapartist. and where do you suppose Bonapartism evolved from? Stop being pedantic and start addressing the real elephantine-sized platypus in the room. And Burun, I know you can't see very well, what with it being so dark up Rob's arsehole, but Chris' surname is Cutrone, not Cuttrone. But you wouldn't know that, not having done any research yourself, as ever. "Oh boo hoo hoo, I can't address the fact that I've been lavishing slavish adoration onto a nonce-case to the exclusion of all other things, quite noticeably for the last 3 months, and so I'll project onto Bumjaw as a distraction instead and attempt to pick up some brownie-points as a grammar nazi." It's poor stuff Mike and you're capable of much better than this. I'm actually younger than you and still I don't need the approval of someone who's still stuck in mid-00s forum spats. And now you're echoing Seals wrong-footed analysis from the previous night, can't you actually formulate any independent arguments or viewpoints of your own? As for 'intellectually insecure', tell that to my PhD supervisor. I know MANY people who are academically brilliant but when it comes to sheer common sense or social interactivity skills, they are severely lacking. You are presently acting like one of them. Why don't you ask Wob for a cuggle? Once again, complete denialism. Do you honestly think this whole “Burrunjor is a Rob Filth sycophant” narrative holds up one little bit? He’s good friends with Twatman, and we’ve both had political disagreements in the past. There's little in common between us, other than we don't like dirty nonce-cases, which I think you'll find is also the case with most other people too. Now pull your head out from your radicalized arse, get over your butthurt wounded pride, and mature yourself to the fact Cutrone's made some reprehensible comments for which there can be NO justification whatever the context, because when it comes to attempting to revive the nostalgia of early 00's forum spats you've done a pretty darn good job of that yourself. I deliberately tried to avoid a forum battle and calm things down and put them into perspective in the early stages of this whole thing and all I've been met with is self-projection, condescending sneering, immature denialism, and outright prevarication. If anyone caused a forum war, it was yourself.
|
|
|
Post by RobFilth on Mar 25, 2021 4:57:17 GMT
Chris didn't defend NAMBLA (not MAMBLA, whatever that is). Yes he did. He not only defended them, HE ENDORSED THEM. Now stop talking shit, there was no context to twist there. The statement was quite blatant, clear and concise without any vagueness or obliqueness whatsoever. I'm happy for either of you to dislike Platypus, but I want you to actually know what you're talking about, which you don't. No you don't, you want to prevaricate by referring us to Adornos essay instead to try and obfuscate the revolting spin Cutrone applied to it. Stop trying to prevaricate for a nonce Mike, it's making you look an idiot. The intent behind Cutrones statement is clearly apparent. Attempting to treat people like idiots over this is making yourself look an idiot. If you think NAMBLA hold a Marxist position which is "very good", then you need professional help mate. and probably sooner rather than later.
|
|
|
Post by RobFilth on Mar 25, 2021 6:37:37 GMT
But you wouldn't know that, not having done any research yourself, as ever. This one is kind of rich considering that you obviously had done no previous research into Platypus yourself, bothered to look at their agendas, who they're funded by or to examine any of the criticisms of. For goodness sakes Mike, if you're going to be radicalized by someone at least bloody well research them a bit first! When I first stumbled across Cutrones indefensible statement(and it IS indefensible, so don't even continue to go there with your idiotic context twisted prevarication because it just makes you look completely stupid), your very first initial reaction was outright denial. Pointing out Cutrone was currently engaged in a long term relationship. WTF? Do you honestly consider that ANY kind of defense for such a revolting statement? It was pure deflection, and that's all you have been doing ever since. Why? You don't owe Cutrone not a damn thing. It just makes you look desperate Mike. It's not a good look at all. Start some independent thought processes for goodness sakes. I guess you think Platypus are funded purely by members donations too, huh? Dream on. You don't get to be a globally expanding organization within Academia purely from the goodness of students hearts or the openness of their disposable incomes. Admittedly, this one was harder to gauge because they're neither transparent nor upfront about their revenues or accounts which is never a good sign for ANY organization, particularly one in which their founders make such dodgy claims or affiliate with such questionable people. They're funded by Rockefeller and Evangelist/Baptist organizations as well as relying upon the wealthy donations of billionaire oligarchs whose money sifts through the University of Chicago Student Government. To Cutrone and his creeps, all Left-Wing politics are for is a sneering after dinner party amusement in elitism, a pseudo-intellectual diversionary exercise to tickle and alleviate the crushing boredom of comfortable bourgeois monotony. They have little to do with the very real Class War which takes place and experienced on the streets and ghettos every single day and in which Left Wing politics are firmly rooted both in a contemporary and historical sense, nor indeed with revolutionary class action. In fact their ilk are bred specifically to stifle such endeavors, not enable them. Do you honestly think the revolution will be funded by US Imperialistic oligarchs via a private system of academia? Wake the hell up. Prancing around gatecrashing left wing debates repeating Platypuses gibberish mantra that everyone is "fake left" whilst sprinkling around arcane German phrases with a detached sneering pseudo-intellectual elitism is just making yourself look a complete laughing stock Mike. You probably think you're expressing individual intellectual self-empowerment, but it really isn't. It's establishment radicalization designed to disrupt class solidarity and you deserve much better than that. You owe it to yourself to put this childishness behind you and move on.
|
|
|
Post by burrunjor on Mar 25, 2021 10:11:45 GMT
As for 'intellectually insecure', tell that to my PhD supervisor. I know MANY people who are academically brilliant but when it comes to sheer common sense or social interactivity skills, they are severely lacking. You are presently acting like one of them. Why don't you ask Wob for a cuggle? Once again, complete denialism. Do you honestly think this whole “Burrunjor is a Rob Filth sycophant” narrative holds up one little bit? He’s good friends with Twatman, and we’ve both had political disagreements in the past. There's little in common between us, other than we don't like dirty nonce-cases, which I think you'll find is also the case with most other people too. Now pull your head out from your radicalized arse, get over your butthurt wounded pride, and mature yourself to the fact Cutrone's made some reprehensible comments for which there can be NO justification whatever the context, because when it comes to attempting to revive the nostalgia of early 00's forum spats you've done a pretty darn good job of that yourself. I deliberately tried to avoid a forum battle and calm things down and put them into perspective in the early stages of this whole thing and all I've been met with is self-projection, condescending sneering, immature denialism, and outright prevarication. If anyone caused a forum war, it was yourself. "Tell that to my PHD supervisor. " LMAO how could I have missed that? Jesus Mike that IS intellectually insecure. I have a degree from Strathclyde University BTW. How often do you ever see me bring that up here or on any other forum like GB when I get called a moron? This is I think the first time I've ever brought it up. The reason I don't try to appeal to authority to people who haven't gone to University and say "well I must be smarter as I have a degree." is because I hope my arguments about everything from Islam to Jodie, to Amy Winehouse stand up on their own merits. I'm secure about them being right. Seriously Mike by trying to appeal to the authority of education you remind me of Frasier. "I have a degree from Harvard. Whenever I'm wrong the world makes a little less sense." Definition of intellectual insecurity. Also Rob is spot on. Whilst he may have perhaps been too much of a pisstaker the last few days, (though that cartoon Platypus video is hysterical,) if anything you've got off lightly for being part of a cult where the leader says this. "I think the Spartacist position in defense of NAMBLA (North American Man-Boy Love Association) and calling for abolishing age of consent laws is very good, and is in fact one of their better positions. The reason this is a Marxist position is that it recognizes the historical transformability of sexual morality and looks forwards to emancipation. Most of the fake “Left” are utter reactionaries by comparison."
If all I got where a few posts mocking me after being part of that. I'd be happy. PS the pisstaking posts haven't even been about you! They've been about Platypus like that Cartman one or the Rolf Harris threads. You were mentioned directly here, after you mentioned me, but other than that it's all been about Platypus yet you still get offended? The only reason I am getting dragged back into this argument again however is Ludders latest attempt to try and end this war on ArcHive. Not once did he even mention me in that post. Me he had been slagging off behind my back, took a dislike too for no reason, that he had really upset. Not once in any of the times I actually contacted him or Lady and let them know how much their ganging up on me upset me, did any of them have the guts to actually say anything to my face or even respond. In all instances I've just been left out as though "oh who cares about him. As long as we get Rob back on our side that's all that matters." Pretty shitty thing to do. PS you guys aren't going to stop Rob mocking Platypus because it's a creepy cult. And that really is all I'm going to say now. I'll leave the rest to Rob.
|
|
|
Post by burrunjor on Apr 4, 2021 8:05:29 GMT
I know Freema Agyeman day is over, but I love this interview. Her voice is just so sexy here. Freema is so likable, down to earth and cute too. I'm shocked that Big Finish haven't scooped her up since? Not even just for Martha. Her voice is perfect for so many things.
The fangirl interviewing her should have asked if Martha had a PHD supervisor though. I often think that might be why the Tenth Doctor didn't fancy or respect her. He couldn't get in touch with her PHD supervisor and find out if she was really smart or secure about being smart.
|
|
|
Post by iank on Apr 4, 2021 8:59:08 GMT
Isn't she a regular on a US medical drama? Probably too busy for BF, like Kazza.
|
|